Everipedia Logo
Everipedia is now IQ.wiki - Join the IQ Brainlist and our Discord for early access to editing on the new platform and to participate in the beta testing.
Toxic shock syndrome

Toxic shock syndrome

Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is a condition caused by bacterial toxins.[1] Symptoms may include fever, rash, skin peeling, and low blood pressure.[1] There may also be symptoms related to the specific underlying infection such as mastitis, osteomyelitis, necrotising fasciitis, or pneumonia.[1]

TSS is typically caused bacteria of the Streptococcus pyogenes or Staphylococcus aureus type, though others may also be involved.[1][2] Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome is sometimes referred to as toxic-shock-like syndrome (TSLS).[1] The underlying mechanism involves the production of superantigens during an invasive streptococcus infection or a localized staphylococcus infection.[1] Risk factors for the staphylococcal type include the use of very absorbent tampons, and skin lesions in young children.[1] Diagnosis is typically based on symptoms.[1]

Treatment includes intravenous fluids, antibiotics, incision and drainage of any abscesses, and possibly intravenous immunoglobulin.[1][4] The need for rapid removal of infected tissue via surgery in those with a streptococcal cause, while commonly recommended, is poorly supported by the evidence.[1] Some recommend delaying surgical debridement.[1] The overall risk of death is about 50% in streptococcal disease, and 5% in staphylococcal disease.[1] Death may occur within 2 days.[1]

In the United States streptococcal TSS occurs in about 3 per 100,000 per year, and staphylococcal TSS in about 0.5 per 100,000 per year.[1] The condition is more common in the developing world.[1] It was first described in 1927.[1] Due to the association with very absorbent tampons, these products were removed from sale.[1]

Toxic shock syndrome
Toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 protein from staphylococcus
SpecialtyInfectious disease
SymptomsFever, rash, skin peeling, low blood pressure[1]
Usual onsetRapid[1]
TypesStaphylococcal (menstrual and nonmenstrual), streptococcal[1]
CausesStreptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, others[1][2]
Risk factorsVery absorbent tampons, skin lesions in young children[1]
Diagnostic methodBased on symptoms[1]
Differential diagnosisSeptic shock, Kawasaki's disease, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, scarlet fever[3]
TreatmentAntibiotics, incision and drainage of any abscesses, intravenous immunoglobulin[1]
PrognosisRisk of death: ~50% (streptococcal), ~5% (staphylococcal)[1]
Frequency3 per 100,000 per year (developed world)[1]

Signs and symptoms

Symptoms of toxic shock syndrome (TSS) vary depending on the underlying cause. TSS resulting from infection with the bacterium Staphylococcus aureus typically manifests in otherwise healthy individuals via signs and symptoms including high fever, accompanied by low blood pressure, malaise and confusion,[2] which can rapidly progress to stupor, coma, and multiple organ failure. The characteristic rash, often seen early in the course of illness, resembles a sunburn[2] (conversely, streptococcal TSS will rarely involve a sunburn-like rash), and can involve any region of the body including the lips, mouth, eyes, palms and soles of the feet.[2] In patients who survive, the rash desquamates (peels off) after 10–21 days.[2]

STSS caused by the bacterium Streptococcus pyogenes, or TSLS, typically presents in people with pre-existing skin infections with the bacteria. These individuals often experience severe pain at the site of the skin infection, followed by rapid progression of symptoms as described above for TSS.


In both TSS (caused by S. aureus) and TSLS (caused by S. pyogenes), disease progression stems from a superantigen toxin. The toxin in S. aureus infections is TSS Toxin-1, or TSST-1. The TSST-1 is secreted as a single polypeptide chain. The gene encoding toxic shock syndrome toxin is carried by a mobile genetic element of S. aureus in the SaPI family of pathogenicity islands.[5] The toxin causes the non-specific binding of MHC II, on professional antigen presenting cells, with T-cell receptors, on T cells.

In typical T-cell recognition, an antigen is taken up by an antigen-presenting cell, processed, expressed on the cell surface in complex with class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) in a groove formed by the alpha and beta chains of class II MHC, and recognized by an antigen-specific T-cell receptor. This results in polyclonal T-cell activation. Superantigens do not require processing by antigen-presenting cells but instead interact directly with the invariant region of the class II MHC molecule. In patients with TSS, up to 20% of the body's T-cells can be activated at one time. This polyclonal T-cell population causes a cytokine storm,[4] followed by a multisystem disease.


For staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome, the diagnosis is based upon CDC criteria defined in 2011, as follows:[6]

  1. Body temperature > 38.9 °C (102.02 °F)

  2. Systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg

  3. Diffuse macular erythroderma

  4. Desquamation (especially of the palms and soles) 1–2 weeks after onset

  5. Involvement of three or more organ systems: Gastrointestinal (vomiting, diarrhea) Muscular: severe myalgia or creatine phosphokinase level at least twice the upper limit of normal for laboratory Mucous membrane hyperemia (vaginal, oral, conjunctival) Kidney failure (serum creatinine > 2 times normal) Liver inflammation (bilirubin, AST, or ALT > 2 times normal) Low platelet count (platelet count < 100,000 / mm3) Central nervous system involvement (confusion without any focal neurological findings)

  6. Negative results of: Blood, throat, and CSF cultures for other bacteria (besides S. aureus) Negative serology for Rickettsia infection, leptospirosis, and measles

Cases are classified as confirmed or probable as follows:

  • Confirmed: All six of the criteria above are met (unless the patient dies before desquamation can occur)

  • Probable: Five of the six criteria above are met


The severity of this disease frequently warrants hospitalization. Admission to the intensive care unit is often necessary for supportive care (for aggressive fluid management, ventilation, renal replacement therapy and inotropic support), particularly in the case of multiple organ failure.[7] Treatment includes removal or draining of the source of infection—often a tampon—and draining of abscesses. Outcomes are poorer in patients who do not have the source of infection removed.[7]

Antibiotic treatment should cover both S. pyogenes and S. aureus. This may include a combination of cephalosporins, penicillins or vancomycin. The addition of clindamycin[8] or gentamicin[9] reduces toxin production and mortality.


With proper treatment, people usually recover in two to three weeks. The condition can, however, be fatal within hours.


Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome is rare and the number of reported cases has declined significantly since the 1980s. Patrick Schlievert, who published a study on it in 2004, determined incidence at three to four out of 100,000 tampon users per year; the information supplied by manufacturers of sanitary products such as Tampax and Stayfree puts it at one to 17 of every 100,000 menstruating females per year.[10][11]

Philip M. Tierno Jr. helped determine that tampons were behind TSS cases in the early 1980s. Tierno blames the introduction of higher-absorbency tampons in 1978. A study by Tierno also determined that all-cotton tampons were less likely to produce the conditions in which TSS can grow; this was done using a direct comparison of 20 brands of tampons including conventional cotton/rayon tampons and 100% organic cotton tampons from Natracare. In fact, Dr Tierno goes as far to state, "The bottom line is that you can get TSS with synthetic tampons, but not with an all-cotton tampon."[12]

A rise in reported cases occurred in the early 2000s: eight deaths from the syndrome in California in 2002 after three successive years of four deaths per year, and Schlievert's study found cases in part of Minnesota more than tripled from 2000 to 2003.[10] Schlievert considers earlier onset of menstruation to be a cause of the rise; others, such as Philip M. Tierno and Bruce A. Hanna, blame new high-absorbency tampons introduced in 1999 and manufacturers discontinuing warnings not to leave tampons in overnight.[10]

TSS is more common during the winter and spring and occurs most often in the young and old.[2]


Initial description

The term "toxic shock syndrome" was first used in 1978 by a Denver pediatrician, James K. Todd, to describe the staphylococcal illness in three boys and four girls aged 8–17 years.[13] Even though S. aureus was isolated from mucosal sites in the patients, bacteria could not be isolated from the blood, cerebrospinal fluid, or urine, raising suspicion that a toxin was involved. The authors of the study noted reports of similar staphylococcal illnesses had appeared occasionally as far back as 1927, but the authors at the time failed to consider the possibility of a connection between toxic shock syndrome and tampon use, as three of the girls who were menstruating when the illness developed were using tampons. Many cases of TSS occurred after tampons were left in after they should have been removed.[14]

Rely tampons

Following controversial test marketing in Rochester, New York, and Fort Wayne, Indiana,[15] in August 1978, Procter and Gamble introduced superabsorbent Rely tampons to the United States market[16] in response to women's demands for tampons that could contain an entire menstrual flow without leaking or replacement.[17] Rely used carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and compressed beads of polyester for absorption. This tampon design could absorb nearly 20 times its own weight in fluid.[18] Further, the tampon would "blossom" into a cup shape in the vagina to hold menstrual fluids without leakage.

In January 1980, epidemiologists in Wisconsin and Minnesota reported the appearance of TSS, mostly in those menstruating, to the CDC.[19] S. aureus was successfully cultured from most of the subjects. The Toxic Shock Syndrome Task Force was created and investigated the epidemic as the number of reported cases rose throughout the summer of 1980.[20] In September 1980, CDC reported users of Rely were at increased risk for developing TSS.[21]

On 22 September 1980, Procter and Gamble recalled Rely[22] following release of the CDC report. As part of the voluntary recall, Procter and Gamble entered into a consent agreement with the FDA "providing for a program for notification to consumers and retrieval of the product from the market".[23] However, it was clear to other investigators that Rely was not the only culprit. Other regions of the United States saw increases in menstrual TSS before Rely was introduced.[24]

It was shown later that higher absorbency of tampons was associated with an increased risk for TSS, regardless of the chemical composition or the brand of the tampon. The sole exception was Rely, for which the risk for TSS was still higher when corrected for its absorbency.[25] The ability of carboxymethylcellulose to filter the S. aureus toxin that causes TSS may account for the increased risk associated with Rely.[18]

Notable cases

  • Clive Barker, fully recovered, contracted the syndrome after visiting the dentist.[26]

  • Lana Coc-Kroft, fully recovered, contracted the syndrome due to group A streptococcal infection.[27]

  • Jim Henson, d. 1990, contracted the syndrome due to group A streptococcal infection and subsequently died from it.[28][29]

  • Nan C. Robertson, d. 2009, the 1983 winner of the Pulitzer Prize for Feature Writing for her medically detailed account of her struggle with toxic shock syndrome, a cover story for The New York Times Magazine which at that time became the most widely syndicated article in Times history.[30]

  • Mike Von Erich, d. 1987, developed the syndrome after shoulder surgery: he made an apparent recovery but suffered brain damage and weight loss as a result of the condition; he died by suicide later.[31]

  • Lauren Wasser recovered from a near-death TSS experience and then debuted at the New York Fashion Week despite wearing a prosthetic leg.[32] She is now advocating for laws to require more research into the safety of feminine hygiene products.[33]


Citation Link//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23830657Low, DE (July 2013). "Toxic shock syndrome: major advances in pathogenesis, but not treatment". Critical Care Clinics. 29 (3): 651–75. doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2013.03.012. PMID 23830657.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Link//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29366615Gottlieb, Michael; Long, Brit; Koyfman, Alex (June 2018). "The Evaluation and Management of Toxic Shock Syndrome in the Emergency Department: A Review of the Literature". The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 54 (6): 807–814. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.12.048. PMID 29366615.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgFerri, Fred F. (2010). Ferri's differential diagnosis : a practical guide to the differential diagnosis of symptoms, signs, and clinical disorders (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Elsevier/Mosby. p. Chapter T. ISBN 978-0323076999.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Link//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28646955Wilkins, Amanda L.; Steer, Andrew C.; Smeesters, Pierre R.; Curtis, Nigel (2017). "Toxic shock syndrome – the seven Rs of management and treatment". Journal of Infection. 74: S147–S152. doi:10.1016/S0163-4453(17)30206-2. PMID 28646955.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Link//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9720870Lindsay, JA; Ruzin, A; Ross, HF; Kurepina, N; Novick, RP (July 1998). "The gene for toxic shock toxin is carried by a family of mobile pathogenicity islands in Staphylococcus aureus". Molecular Microbiology. 29 (2): 527–43. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00947.x. PMID 9720870.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Linkweb.archive.org"Toxic shock syndrome (other than Streptococcal) (TSS): 2011 Case Definition". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 8 May 2014. Archived from the original on 19 August 2014. Retrieved 17 August 2014.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Link//doi.org/10.1097%2F00006454-199912000-00014Zimbelman J, Palmer A, Todd J (1999). "Improved outcome of clindamycin compared with beta-lactam antibiotic treatment for invasive Streptococcus pyogenes infection". The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 18 (12): 1096–1100. doi:10.1097/00006454-199912000-00014.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Link//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6715902Schlievert PM, Kelly JA (1984). "Clindamycin-induced suppression of toxic-shock syndrome-associated exotoxin production". The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 149 (3): 471. doi:10.1093/infdis/149.3.471. PMID 6715902.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Link//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9257741van Langevelde P, van Dissel JT, Meurs CJ, Renz J, Groeneveld PH (1 August 1997). "Combination of flucloxacillin and gentamicin inhibits toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 production by Staphylococcus aureus in both logarithmic and stationary phases of growth". Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 41 (8): 1682–5. doi:10.1128/AAC.41.8.1682. PMC 163985. PMID 9257741.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Linkwww.seattletimes.comLyons, Julie Sevrens (25 January 2005). "A New Generation Faces Toxic Shock Syndrome". The Seattle Times. Knight Ridder Newspapers. first published as "Lingering Risk", San Jose Mercury News, 13 December 2004
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Linkwww.stayfree.com"Stayfree — FAQ About Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS)". 2006. Archived from the original on 23 March 2007. Retrieved 13 October 2006.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Linkweb.archive.orgLindsey, Emma (6 November 2003). "Welcome to the cotton club". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 9 November 2016.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Link//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/82681Todd J, Fishaut M, Kapral F, Welch T (1978). "Toxic-shock syndrome associated with phage-group-I staphylococci". The Lancet. 2 (8100): 1116–8. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(78)92274-2. PMID 82681.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Link//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7232057Todd J (1981). "Toxic shock syndrome—scientific uncertainty and the public media". Pediatrics. 67 (6): 921–3. PMID 7232057.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Linkweb.archive.orgFinley, Harry. "Rely Tampon: It Even Absorbed the Worry!". Museum of Menstruation. Archived from the original on 14 April 2006. Retrieved 20 March 2006.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Link//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8073784Hanrahan S; Submission, Haworth Continuing Features (1994). "Historical review of menstrual toxic shock syndrome". Women & Health. 21 (2–3): 141–65. doi:10.1300/J013v21n02_09. PMID 8073784.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Linkweb.archive.orgCitrinbaum, Joanna (14 October 2003). "The question's absorbing: 'Are tampons little white lies?'". The Daily Collegian. Archived from the original on 20 June 2017. Retrieved 27 December 2015.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Linkwww.io.comVitale, Sidra (1997). "Toxic Shock Syndrome". Web by Women, for Women. Archived from the original on 16 March 2006. Retrieved 20 March 2006.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Linkweb.archive.orgCDC (23 May 1980). "Toxic-shock syndrome—United States". Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 29 (20): 229–230. Archived from the original on 20 October 2014.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM
Citation Linkweb.archive.orgDennis Hevesi (10 September 2011). "Bruce Dan, Who Helped Link Toxic Shock and Tampons, Is Dead at 64". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 11 September 2011. Retrieved 12 September 2011. Dr. Bruce Dan, who as a leading federal researcher helped establish a link between the life-threatening disease toxic shock syndrome and the use of tampons, prompting a major shift in the way tampons are produced, died Tuesday in Baltimore. He was 64.
Sep 29, 2019, 6:37 PM