Everipedia Logo
Everipedia is now IQ.wiki - Join the IQ Brainlist and our Discord for early access to editing on the new platform and to participate in the beta testing.


A politician is a person active in party politics, or a person holding or seeking office in government. Politicians propose, support and create laws or policies that govern the land and, by extension, its people. Broadly speaking, a "politician" can be anyone who seeks to achieve political power in any bureaucratic institution.

NamesCongressman, chancellor, MP, mayor, premier, president, prime minister, senator, governor, secretary, minister, dictator
Law,law enforcement,business,journalism,public relations,diplomacy,management,military
CompetenciesCritical thinkingLawLegal researchLegal ethics Public speakingBudgetingDecision makingCommunications
Only a fair and properelectionto office is necessary, although formal education is highly recommended.
Courts,government,legal aid, military
Judge,Attorney,Business,Journalist,Spokesperson, Manager


Politicians are people who are politically active, especially in party politics.

Positions range from local offices to executive, legislative, and judicial offices of regional and national governments.[1][2] Some elected law enforcement officers, such as sheriffs, are considered politicians.[3]*Crimin]]Crimin]]

Media and rhetoric

Politicians are known for their rhetoric, as in speeches or campaign advertisements.

They are especially known for using common themes that allow them to develop their political positions in terms familiar to the voters.[5]*Politicians%20and%20rhetori]]*oliticians of necessity become expert users of the media. ell as posters.[7] In the 20th century, they branched into radio and television, making television commercials the single most expensive part of an election campaign.[8] In the 21st century, they have become increasingly involved with the social media based on the Internet and smartphones.[9]

Rumor has always played a major role in politics, with negative rumors about an opponent typically more effective than positive rumors about one's own side.[10]

Bureaucracy and spoils

Once elected, the politician becomes a government official and has to deal with a permanent bureaucracy of non-politicians.

Historically, there has been a subtle conflict between the long-term goals of each side.[11] In patronage-based systems, such as the United States and Canada in the 19th century, winning politicians replace the bureaucracy with local politicians who formed their base of support, the "spoils system". Civil service reform was initiated to eliminate the corruption of government services that were involved.[12] However, in many less developed countries, the spoils system is in full-scale operation today.[13]


Mattozzi and Merlo argue that there are two main career paths which are typically followed by politicians in modern democracies.

First, come the career politicians.

They are politicians who work in the political sector until retirement.

Second, are the "political careerists".

These are politicians who gain a reputation for expertise in controlling certain bureaucracies, then leave politics for a well-paid career in the private sector making use of their political contacts.[14]


Numerous scholars have studied the characteristics of politicians, comparing those at the local and national levels, and comparing the more liberal or the more conservative ones, and comparing the more successful and less successful in terms of elections.[15] In recent years, special attention has focused on the distinctive career path of women politicians.[16]*Unfin]]*Unfin]]*or example, there are studies of the "Supermadre" model in Latin American politics.

Many politicians have the knack to remember thousands of names and faces and recall personal anecdotes about their constituents—it is an advantage in the job, rather like being seven-foot tall for a basketball player.

United States Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton were renowned for their memories.[18][19]


Many critics attack politicians for being out of touch with the public.

Areas of friction include the manner in which politicians speak, which has been described as being overly formal and filled with many euphemistic and metaphorical expressions and commonly perceived as an attempt to "obscure, mislead, and confuse".[20]

In the popular image, politicians are thought of as clueless, selfish, incompetent and corrupt, taking money in exchange for goods or services, rather than working for the general public good.[21] Politicians in many countries are regarded as the "most hated professionals".[21]

See also


Citation Linkwww.yourdictionary.com"politician - Webster's New World College Dictionary". Yourdictionary.com. 21 May 2013. Retrieved 26 June 2013.
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkwww.wordfind.com"politician - Princeton Wordnet dictionary". wordfind.com.
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgGaines, Miller, Larry, Roger LeRoy (2012). Criminal Justice in Action. Wadsworth Publishing. p. 152. ISBN 978-1111835576.
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgGrant, Grant, Donald Lee, Jonathan (2001). The Way It Was in the South: The Black Experience in Georgia. University of Georgia Press. p. 449. ISBN 978-0820323299.
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgJonathan Charteris-Black, Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor (Palgrave-MacMillan, 2005)
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgOfer Feldman, Beyond public speech and symbols: Explorations in the rhetoric of politicians and the media (2000).
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkwww.questia.comRobert J. Dinkin, Campaigning in America: A History of Election Practices (1989) online
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgKathleen Hall Jamieson and Keith Spillette, The Press Effect: Politicians, Journalists, and the Stories that Shape the Political World (2014)
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkwww.questia.comNathaniel G. Pearlman, Margin of Victory: How Technologists Help Politicians Win Elections (2012) online
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgDavid Coast and Jo Fox, "Rumour and Politics" History Compass (2015), 13#5 pp 222-234.
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgJoel D. Aberbach, Robert D. Putnam, and Bert A. Rockman, eds., Bureaucrats and politicians in western democracies (Harvard University Press, 1981)
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgDavid A. Schultz, and Robert Maranto, eds., The politics of civil service reform (1998).
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgMorris Szeftel, "Political graft and the spoils system in Zambia—the state as a resource in itself." Review of African Political Economy 9.24 (1982): 4-21.
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgAndrea Mattozzi and Antonio Merlo, "Political careers or career politicians?." Journal of Public Economics 92#3 (2008): 597-608.
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgTimothy S. Prinz, "The career paths of elected politicians: a review and prospectus." in Shirley Williams and Edward L. Lascher, eds. Ambition and beyond: career paths of American politicians (1993) pp: 11-63.
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgElina Haavio-Mannila and Torild Skard, eds. Unfinished Democracy: women in Nordic politics (2013)
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgElsa M. Chaney, Supermadre: Women in Politics in Latin America (University of Texas Press, 2014).
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkbooks.google.comIwan W. Morgan (2010). Assessing George W. Bush's Legacy: The Right Man?. p. 45. ISBN 9780230114333.
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkbooks.google.comJames E. Mueller (2008). Tag Teaming the Press: How Bill and Hillary Clinton Work Together to Handle the Media. p. 32. ISBN 9780742563926.
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgInvitation to Critical Thinking - Page 319, Vincent E. Barry - 2007
Sep 28, 2019, 10:33 PM