Everipedia Logo
Everipedia is now IQ.wiki - Join the IQ Brainlist and our Discord for early access to editing on the new platform and to participate in the beta testing.


A pension (/ˈpɛnʃən/, from Latin pensiō, "payment") is a fund into which a sum of money is added during an employee's employment years and from which payments are drawn to support the person's retirement from work in the form of periodic payments. A pension may be a "defined benefit plan", where a fixed sum is paid regularly to a person, or a "defined contribution plan", under which a fixed sum is invested that then becomes available at retirement age.[1] Pensions should not be confused with severance pay; the former is usually paid in regular installments for life after retirement, while the latter is typically paid as a fixed amount after involuntary termination of employment prior to retirement.

The terms "retirement plan" and "superannuation" tend to refer to a pension granted upon retirement of the individual.[2] Retirement plans may be set up by employers, insurance companies, the government, or other institutions such as employer associations or trade unions. Called retirement plans in the United States, they are commonly known as pension schemes in the United Kingdom and Ireland and superannuation plans (or super[3]) in Australia and New Zealand. Retirement pensions are typically in the form of a guaranteed life annuity, thus insuring against the risk of longevity.

A pension created by an employer for the benefit of an employee is commonly referred to as an occupational or employer pension. Labor unions, the government, or other organizations may also fund pensions. Occupational pensions are a form of deferred compensation, usually advantageous to employee and employer for tax reasons. Many pensions also contain an additional insurance aspect, since they often will pay benefits to survivors or disabled beneficiaries. Other vehicles (certain lottery payouts, for example, or an annuity) may provide a similar stream of payments.

The common use of the term pension is to describe the payments a person receives upon retirement, usually under pre-determined legal or contractual terms. A recipient of a retirement pension is known as a pensioner or retiree.

Types of pensions

Employment-based pensions

A retirement plan is an arrangement to provide people with an income during retirement when they are no longer earning a steady income from employment. Often retirement plans require both the employer and employee to contribute money to a fund during their employment in order to receive defined benefits upon retirement. It is a tax deferred savings vehicle that allows for the tax-free accumulation of a fund for later use as a retirement income. Funding can be provided in other ways, such as from labor unions, government agencies, or self-funded schemes. Pension plans are therefore a form of "deferred compensation". A SSAS is a type of employment-based Pension in the UK.

Some countries also grant pensions to military veterans. Military pensions are overseen by the government; an example of a standing agency is the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. Ad hoc committees may also be formed to investigate specific tasks, such as the U.S. Commission on Veterans' Pensions (commonly known as the "Bradley Commission") in 1955–56. Pensions may extend past the death of the veteran himself, continuing to be paid to the widow.

Social and state pensions

Many countries have created funds for their citizens and residents to provide income when they retire (or in some cases become disabled). Typically this requires payments throughout the citizen's working life in order to qualify for benefits later on. A basic state pension is a "contribution based" benefit, and depends on an individual's contribution history. For examples, see National Insurance in the UK, or Social Security in the United States of America.

Many countries have also put in place a "social pension". These are regular, tax-funded non-contributory cash transfers paid to older people. Over 80 countries have social pensions.[4] Some are universal benefits, given to all older people regardless of income, assets or employment record. Examples of universal pensions include New Zealand Superannuation[5] and the Basic Retirement Pension of Mauritius.[6] Most social pensions, though, are means-tested, such as Supplemental Security Income in the United States of America or the "older person's grant" in South Africa.[7]

Disability pensions

Some pension plans will provide for members in the event they suffer a disability. This may take the form of early entry into a retirement plan for a disabled member below the normal retirement age.


Retirement plans may be classified as defined benefit or defined contribution according to how the benefits are determined.[8] A defined benefit plan guarantees a certain payout at retirement, according to a fixed formula which usually depends on the member's salary and the number of years' membership in the plan. A defined contribution plan will provide a payout at retirement that is dependent upon the amount of money contributed and the performance of the investment vehicles utilized. Hence, with a defined contribution plan the risk and responsibility lies with the employee that the funding will be sufficient through retirement, whereas with the defined benefit plan the risk and responsibility lies with the employer or plan managers.

Some types of retirement plans, such as cash balance plans, combine features of both defined benefit and defined contribution plans. They are often referred to as hybrid plans. Such plan designs have become increasingly popular in the US since the 1990s. Examples include Cash Balance and Pension Equity plans.

Defined benefit plans

A traditional defined benefit (DB) plan is a plan in which the benefit on retirement is determined by a set formula, rather than depending on investment returns. Government pensions such as Social Security in the United States are a type of defined benefit pension plan. Traditionally, defined benefit plans for employers have been administered by institutions which exist specifically for that purpose, by large businesses, or, for government workers, by the government itself. A traditional form of defined benefit plan is the final salary plan, under which the pension paid is equal to the number of years worked, multiplied by the member's salary at retirement, multiplied by a factor known as the accrual rate. The final accrued amount is available as a monthly pension or a lump sum, but usually monthly.

The benefit in a defined benefit pension plan is determined by a formula that can incorporate the employee's pay, years of employment, age at retirement, and other factors. A simple example is a Dollars Times Service plan design that provides a certain amount per month based on the time an employee works for a company. For example, a plan offering $100 a month per year of service would provide $3,000 per month to a retiree with 30 years of service. While this type of plan is popular among unionized workers, Final Average Pay (FAP) remains the most common type of defined benefit plan offered in the United States. In FAP plans, the average salary over the final years of an employee's career determines the benefit amount.

Averaging salary over a number of years means that the calculation is averaging different dollars. For example, if salary is averaged over five years, and retirement is in 2009, then salary in 2004 dollars is averaged with salary in 2005 dollars, etc., with 2004 dollars being worth more than the dollars of succeeding years. The pension is then paid in first year of retirement dollars, in this example 2009 dollars, with the lowest value of any dollars in the calculation. Thus inflation in the salary averaging years has a considerable impact on purchasing power and cost, both being reduced equally by inflation

This effect of inflation can be eliminated by converting salaries in the averaging years to first year of retirement dollars, and then averaging.

In the US, 26 U.S.C. § 414(j) [34] specifies a defined benefit plan to be any pension plan that is not a defined contribution plan (see below) where a defined contribution plan is any plan with individual accounts. A traditional pension plan that defines a benefit for an employee upon that employee's retirement is a defined benefit plan. In the U.S., corporate defined benefit plans, along with many other types of defined benefit plans, are governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).[9]

In the United Kingdom, benefits are typically indexed for inflation (known as Retail Prices Index (RPI)) as required by law for registered pension plans.[10] Inflation during an employee's retirement affects the purchasing power of the pension; the higher the inflation rate, the lower the purchasing power of a fixed annual pension. This effect can be mitigated by providing annual increases to the pension at the rate of inflation (usually capped, for instance at 5% in any given year). This method is advantageous for the employee since it stabilizes the purchasing power of pensions to some extent.

If the pension plan allows for early retirement, payments are often reduced to recognize that the retirees will receive the payouts for longer periods of time. In the United States, under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, any reduction factor less than or equal to the actuarial early retirement reduction factor is acceptable.[11]

Many DB plans include early retirement provisions to encourage employees to retire early, before the attainment of normal retirement age (usually age 65). Companies would rather hire younger employees at lower wages. Some of those provisions come in the form of additional temporary or supplemental benefits, which are payable to a certain age, usually before attaining normal retirement age.[12]


Defined benefit plans may be either funded or unfunded.

In an unfunded defined benefit pension, no assets are set aside and the benefits are paid for by the employer or other pension sponsor as and when they are paid. Pension arrangements provided by the state in most countries in the world are unfunded, with benefits paid directly from current workers' contributions and taxes. This method of financing is known as pay-as-you-go.[13] The social security systems of many European countries are unfunded,[14] having benefits paid directly out of current taxes and social security contributions, although several countries have hybrid systems which are partially funded. Spain set up the Social Security Reserve Fund and France set up the Pensions Reserve Fund; in Canada the wage-based retirement plan (CPP) is partially funded, with assets managed by the CPP Investment Board while the U.S. Social Security system is partially funded by investment in special U.S. Treasury Bonds.

In a funded plan, contributions from the employer, and sometimes also from plan members, are invested in a fund towards meeting the benefits. All plans must be funded in some way, even if they are pay-as-you-go, so this type of plan is more accurately known as pre-funded. The future returns on the investments, and the future benefits to be paid, are not known in advance, so there is no guarantee that a given level of contributions will be enough to meet the benefits. Typically, the contributions to be paid are regularly reviewed in a valuation of the plan's assets and liabilities, carried out by an actuary to ensure that the pension fund will meet future payment obligations. This means that in a defined benefit pension, investment risk and investment rewards are typically assumed by the sponsor/employer and not by the individual. If a plan is not well-funded, the plan sponsor may not have the financial resources to continue funding the plan.


Traditional defined benefit plan designs (because of their typically flat accrual rate and the decreasing time for interest discounting as people get closer to retirement age) tend to exhibit a J-shaped accrual pattern of benefits, where the present value of benefits grows quite slowly early in an employee's career and accelerates significantly in mid-career: in other words it costs more to fund the pension for older employees than for younger ones (an "age bias"). Defined benefit pensions tend to be less portable than defined contribution plans, even if the plan allows a lump sum cash benefit at termination. Most plans, however, pay their benefits as an annuity, so retirees do not bear the risk of low investment returns on contributions or of outliving their retirement income. The open-ended nature of these risks to the employer is the reason given by many employers for switching from defined benefit to defined contribution plans over recent years. The risks to the employer can sometimes be mitigated by discretionary elements in the benefit structure, for instance in the rate of increase granted on accrued pensions, both before and after retirement.

The age bias, reduced portability and open ended risk make defined benefit plans better suited to large employers with less mobile workforces, such as the public sector (which has open-ended support from taxpayers). This coupled with a lack of foresight on the employers part means a large proportion of the workforce are kept in the dark over future investment schemes.

Defined benefit plans are sometimes criticized as being paternalistic as they enable employers or plan trustees to make decisions about the type of benefits and family structures and lifestyles of their employees. However they are typically more valuable than defined contribution plans in most circumstances and for most employees (mainly because the employer tends to pay higher contributions than under defined contribution plans), so such criticism is rarely harsh.

The "cost" of a defined benefit plan is not easily calculated, and requires an actuary or actuarial software. However, even with the best of tools, the cost of a defined benefit plan will always be an estimate based on economic and financial assumptions. These assumptions include the average retirement age and lifespan of the employees, the returns to be earned by the pension plan's investments and any additional taxes or levies, such as those required by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation in the U.S. So, for this arrangement, the benefit is relatively secure but the contribution is uncertain even when estimated by a professional. This has serious cost considerations and risks for the employer offering a pension plan.

One of the growing concerns with defined benefit plans is that the level of future obligations will outpace the value of assets held by the plan. This "underfunding" dilemma can be faced by any type of defined benefit plan, private or public, but it is most acute in governmental and other public plans where political pressures and less rigorous accounting standards can result in excessive commitments to employees and retirees, but inadequate contributions. Many states and municipalities across the United States of America and Canada now face chronic pension crises.[1][15][16]


Many countries offer state-sponsored retirement benefits, beyond those provided by employers, which are funded by payroll or other taxes. In the United States, the Social Security system is similar in function to a defined benefit pension arrangement, albeit one that is constructed differently from a pension offered by a private employer; however, Social Security is distinct in that there is no legally guaranteed level of benefits derived from the amount paid into the program.

Individuals that have worked in the UK and have paid certain levels of national insurance deductions can expect an income from the state pension scheme after their normal retirement. The state pension is currently divided into two parts: the basic state pension, State Second [tier] Pension scheme called S2P. Individuals will qualify for the basic state pension if they have completed sufficient years contribution to their national insurance record. The S2P pension scheme is earnings related and depends on earnings in each year as to how much an individual can expect to receive. It is possible for an individual to forgo the S2P payment from the state, in lieu of a payment made to an appropriate pension scheme of their choice, during their working life. For more details see UK pension provision.

Defined contribution plans

In a defined contribution plan, contributions are paid into an individual account for each member. The contributions are invested, for example in the stock market, and the returns on the investment (which may be positive or negative) are credited to the individual's account. On retirement, the member's account is used to provide retirement benefits, sometimes through the purchase of an annuity which then provides a regular income. Defined contribution plans have become widespread all over the world in recent years, and are now the dominant form of plan in the private sector in many countries. For example, the number of defined benefit plans in the US has been steadily declining, as more and more employers see pension contributions as a large expense avoidable by disbanding the defined benefit plan and instead offering a defined contribution plan.

Money contributed can either be from employee salary deferral or from employer contributions. The portability of defined contribution pensions is legally no different from the portability of defined benefit plans. However, because of the cost of administration and ease of determining the plan sponsor's liability for defined contribution plans (you do not need to pay an actuary to calculate the lump sum equivalent that you do for defined benefit plans) in practice, defined contribution plans have become generally portable.

In a defined contribution plan, investment risk and investment rewards are assumed by each individual/employee/retiree and not by the sponsor/employer, and these risks may be substantial.[17] In addition, participants do not necessarily purchase annuities with their savings upon retirement, and bear the risk of outliving their assets. (In the United Kingdom, for instance, it is a legal requirement to use the bulk of the fund to purchase an annuity.)

The "cost" of a defined contribution plan is readily calculated, but the benefit from a defined contribution plan depends upon the account balance at the time an employee is looking to use the assets. So, for this arrangement, the contribution is known but the benefit is unknown (until calculated).

Despite the fact that the participant in a defined contribution plan typically has control over investment decisions, the plan sponsor retains a significant degree of fiduciary responsibility over investment of plan assets, including the selection of investment options and administrative providers.

A defined contribution plan typically involves a number of service providers, including in many cases:

  • Trustee

  • Custodian

  • Administrator

  • Recordkeeper

  • Auditor

  • Legal counsel[18]


In the United States, the legal definition of a defined contribution plan is a plan providing for an individual account for each participant, and for benefits based solely on the amount contributed to the account, plus or minus income, gains, expenses and losses allocated to the account (see 26 U.S.C. § 414(i) [35] ). Examples of defined contribution plans in the United States include individual retirement accounts (IRAs) and 401(k) plans. In such plans, the employee is responsible, to one degree or another, for selecting the types of investments toward which the funds in the retirement plan are allocated. This may range from choosing one of a small number of pre-determined mutual funds to selecting individual stocks or other securities. Most self-directed retirement plans are characterized by certain tax advantages, and some provide for a portion of the employee's contributions to be matched by the employer. In exchange, the funds in such plans may not be withdrawn by the investor prior to reaching a certain age—typically the year the employee reaches 59.5 years old-- (with a small number of exceptions) without incurring a substantial penalty.

In the US, defined contribution plans are subject to IRS limits on how much can be contributed, known as the section 415 limit. In 2009, the total deferral amount, including employee contribution plus employer contribution, was limited to $49,000 or 100% of compensation, whichever is less. The employee-only limit in 2009 was $16,500 with a $5,500 catch-up. These numbers usually increase each year and are indexed to compensate for the effects of inflation. For 2015, the limits were raised to $53,000 and $18,000,[19] respectively.

Examples of defined contribution pension schemes in other countries are, the UK's personal pensions and proposed National Employment Savings Trust (NEST), Germany's Riester plans, Australia's Superannuation system and New Zealand's KiwiSaver scheme. Individual pension savings plans also exist in Austria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Greece, Finland, Ireland, Netherlands, Slovenia and Spain[20]

Hybrid and cash balance plans

Hybrid plan designs combine the features of defined benefit and defined contribution plan designs.

A cash balance plan is a defined benefit plan made to appear as if it were a defined contribution plan. They have notional balances in hypothetical accounts where, typically, each year the plan administrator will contribute an amount equal to a certain percentage of each participant's salary; a second contribution, called interest credit, is made as well. These are not actual contributions and further discussion is beyond the scope of this entry suffice it to say that there is currently much controversy. In general, they are usually treated as defined benefit plans for tax, accounting and regulatory purposes. As with defined benefit plans, investment risk in hybrid designs is largely borne by the plan sponsor. As with defined contribution designs, plan benefits are expressed in the terms of a notional account balance, and are usually paid as cash balances upon termination of employment. These features make them more portable than traditional defined benefit plans and perhaps more attractive to a more highly mobile workforce.

Target benefit plans are defined contribution plans made to match (or resemble) defined benefit plans.

Contrasting types of retirement plans

Advocates of defined contribution plans point out that each employee has the ability to tailor the investment portfolio to his or her individual needs and financial situation, including the choice of how much to contribute, if anything at all. However, others state that these apparent advantages could also hinder some workers who might not possess the financial savvy to choose the correct investment vehicles or have the discipline to voluntarily contribute money to retirement accounts. This debate parallels the discussion currently going on in the U.S., where many Republican leaders favor transforming the Social Security system, at least in part, to a self-directed investment plan.


Defined contribution pensions, by definition, are funded, as the "guarantee" made to employees is that specified (defined) contributions will be made during an individual's working life.

There are many ways to finance a pension and save for retirement. Pension plans can be set up by an employer, matching a monetary contribution each month, by the state or personally through a pension scheme with a financial institution, such as a bank or brokerage firm. Pension plans often come with a tax break depending on the country and plan type.

For example, Canadians have the option to open a Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP), as well as a range of employee and state pension programs. This plan allows contributions to this account to be marked as un-taxable income and remain un-taxed until withdrawal. Most countries' governments will provide advice on pension schemes.


The concept of a pension appeared in the 7th-century Rashidun Caliphate as a form of Zakat (charity), one of the Five Pillars of Islam, under early Islamic law. This practice continued well into the Abbasid Caliphate (8th-13th centuries). The taxes collected in the treasury of an Islamic government were used to provide income for the needy, which were classified as the poor, elderly, orphans, widows, and the disabled.[21][22]

Widows' funds were among the first pension type arrangement to appear. For example, Duke Ernest the Pious of Gotha in Germany founded a widows' fund for clergy in 1645 and another for teachers in 1662.[23] 'Various schemes of provision for ministers' widows were then established throughout Europe at about the start of the eighteenth century, some based on a single premium others based on yearly premiums to be distributed as benefits in the same year.'[24]


As part of Otto von Bismarck's social legislation, the Old Age and Disability Insurance Bill in 1889.[25] The Old Age Pension program, financed by a tax on workers, was originally designed to provide a pension annuity for workers who reached the age of 70 years, though this was lowered to 65 years in 1916. It is sometimes claimed that at the time life expectancy for the average Prussian was 45 years; in fact this figure is due to the very high infant mortality and high maternal death rate from childbirth of this era. In fact, an adult entering into insurance under the scheme would on average live to 70 years of age, a figure used in the actuarial assumptions included in the legislation.


There is a history of pensions in Ireland that can be traced back to Brehon Law imposing a legal responsibility on the kin group to take care of its members who were aged, blind, deaf, sick or insane.[26] For a discussion on pension funds and early Irish law, see F Kelly, A Guide to Early Irish Law (Dublin, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, 1988). In 2010, there were over 76,291 pension schemes operating in Ireland.[27]

Today the Republic of Ireland has a two-tiered approach to the provision of pensions or retirement benefits. First, there is a state social welfare retirement pension, which promises a basic level of pension. This is a flat rate pension, funded by the national social insurance system and is termed Pay Related Social Insurance or PRSI. Secondly, there are the occupational pension schemes and self-employed arrangements, which supplement the state pension.

United Kingdom

Until the 20th century, poverty was seen as a quasi-criminal state, and this was reflected in the Vagabonds and Beggars Act 1495 that imprisoned beggars. During Elizabethan and Victorian times, English poor laws represented a shift whereby the poor were seen merely as morally degenerate, and were expected to perform forced labour in workhouses.

The beginning of the modern state pension was the Old Age Pensions Act 1908, that provided 5 shillings (£0.25) a week for those over 70 whose annual means do not exceed £31.50. It coincided with the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws and Relief of Distress 1905-09 and was the first step in the Liberal welfare reforms to the completion of a system of social security, with unemployment and health insurance through the National Insurance Act 1911.

After the Second World War, the National Insurance Act 1946 completed universal coverage of social security. The National Assistance Act 1948 formally abolished the poor law, and gave a minimum income to those not paying national insurance.

The early 1990s established the existing framework for state pensions in the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 and Superannuation and other Funds (Validation) Act 1992. Following the highly respected Goode Report, occupational pensions were covered by comprehensive statutes in the Pension Schemes Act 1993 and the Pensions Act 1995.

In 2002 the Pensions Commission was established as a cross party body to review pensions in the United Kingdom. The first Act to follow was the Pensions Act 2004 that updated regulation by replacing OPRA with the Pensions Regulator and relaxing the stringency of minimum funding requirements for pensions, while ensuring protection for insolvent businesses. In a major update of the state pension, the Pensions Act 2007, which aligned and raised retirement ages. Following that, the Pensions Act 2008 has set up automatic enrolment for occupational pensions, and a public competitor designed to be a low-cost and efficient fund manager, called the National Employment Savings Trust (or "Nest").

United States

Public pensions got their start with various 'promises', informal and legislated, made to veterans of the Revolutionary War and, more extensively, the Civil War. They were expanded greatly, and began to be offered by a number of state and local governments during the early Progressive Era in the late nineteenth century.

Federal civilian pensions were offered under the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS), formed in 1920. CSRS provided retirement, disability and survivor benefits for most civilian employees in the US Federal government, until the creation of a new Federal agency, the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), in 1987.

Pension plans became popular in the United States during World War II, when wage freezes prohibited outright increases in workers' pay. The defined benefit plan had been the most popular and common type of retirement plan in the United States through the 1980s; since that time, defined contribution plans have become the more common type of retirement plan in the United States and many other western countries.

In April 2012, the Northern Mariana Islands Retirement Fund filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The retirement fund is a defined benefit type pension plan and was only partially funded by the government, with only $268.4 million in assets and $911 million in liabilities. The plan experienced low investment returns and a benefit structure that had been increased without raises in funding.[28] According to Pensions and Investments, this is "apparently the first" US public pension plan to declare bankruptcy.[28]

Current challenges

A growing challenge for many nations is population ageing. As birth rates drop and life expectancy increases an ever-larger portion of the population is elderly. This leaves fewer workers for each retired person. In many developed countries this means that government and public sector pensions could potentially be a drag on their economies unless pension systems are reformed or taxes are increased. One method of reforming the pension system is to increase the retirement age. Two exceptions are Australia and Canada, where the pension system is forecast to be solvent for the foreseeable future. In Canada, for instance, the annual payments were increased by some 70% in 1998 to achieve this. These two nations also have an advantage from their relative openness to immigration: immigrants tend to be of working age. However, their populations are not growing as fast as the U.S., which supplements a high immigration rate with one of the highest birthrates among Western countries. Thus, the population in the U.S. is not ageing to the extent as those in Europe, Australia, or Canada.

Another growing challenge is the recent trend of states and businesses in the United States purposely under-funding their pension schemes in order to push the costs onto the federal government. For example, in 2009, the majority of states have unfunded pension liabilities exceeding all reported state debt. Bradley Belt, former executive director of the PBGC (the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, the federal agency that insures private-sector defined-benefit pension plans in the event of bankruptcy), testified before a Congressional hearing in October 2004, "I am particularly concerned with the temptation, and indeed, growing tendency, to use the pension insurance fund as a means to obtain an interest-free and risk-free loan to enable companies to restructure. Unfortunately, the current calculation appears to be that shifting pension liabilities onto other premium payers or potentially taxpayers is the path of least resistance rather than a last resort."

Challenges have further been increased by the post-2007 credit crunch. Total funding of the nation's 100 largest corporate pension plans fell by $303bn in 2008, going from a $86bn surplus at the end of 2007 to a $217bn deficit at the end of 2008.[29]

Pension systems by country

Pension systems by country:[30][31]

CountryPillar 0Pillar 1Pillar 2Pillar 3
AfghanistanAfghanistanNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
AlgeriaAlgeriaGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
ArgentinaArgentinaGreen tickYBasic pensionGreen tickYSocial insurance systemNo, closed in 2008N/A
ArmeniaArmeniaGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemGreen tickYMandatory individual accountsGreen tickYVoluntary pensions
AustraliaAustraliaGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYMandatory occupational pension systemN/AN/A
AustriaAustriaNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemGreen tickYOccupational pensionsGreen tickYPrivate pensions
BahrainBahrainNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
BangladeshBangladeshGreen tickYSocial assistanceN/AN/AN/A
BelarusBelarusGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
BhutanBhutanNoGreen tickYProvident fund systemNoN/A
BelgiumBelgiumGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
BotswanaBotswanaGreen tickYBasic pensionNoNoN/A
BrazilBrazilGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
BruneiBruneiGreen tickYBasic pensionGreen tickYProvident fund systemGreen tickYSupplementary individual accountN/A
BulgariaBulgariaGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemGreen tickYIndividual accountsN/A
Burkina FasoBurkina FasoNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
BurundiBurundiNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
CameroonCameroonNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
CanadaCanadaGreen tickYBasic pensionGreen tickYCanada Pension PlanN/AGreen tickYRegistered Retirement Savings Plan
ChinaPeople's Republic of ChinaGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemGreen tickYMandatory individual accountsN/A
Dominican RepublicDominican RepublicGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYMandatory individual accountsN/AN/A
El SalvadorEl SalvadorGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYMandatory individual accountsN/AN/A
EstoniaEstoniaGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemGreen tickYMandatory individual accountsGreen tickYVoluntary individual accounts
FranceFranceGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemGreen tickYMandatory occupational pension provisionGreen tickY
  • Voluntary private collective pension provision
  • Voluntary private individual pension provision
Georgia (country)GeorgiaGreen tickYBasic pensionN/AN/AN/A
GermanyGermanyGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemGreen tickYVoluntary occupational pension insuranceGreen tickYPrivate pension schemes
Hong KongHong KongGreen tickYBasic pensionGreen tickYProvident fund systemN/AN/A
ItalyItalyGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYNotional Defined ContributionsN/AN/A
JordanJordanNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
KazakhstanKazakhstanGreen tickYBasic pensionGreen tickYMandatory individual accountsN/AN/A
KenyaKenyaGreen tickYOlder Persons Cash TransferGreen tickYMandatory individual accountsNoN/A
KyrgyzstanKyrgyzstanGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYNotional Defined ContributionsNoN/A
LatviaLatviaGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYNotional Defined ContributionsGreen tickYMandatory individual accountsGreen tickYVoluntary individual accounts
LithuaniaLithuaniaGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemGreen tickYVoluntary pension fundGreen tickYVoluntary individual accounts
LuxembourgLuxembourgNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
MalawiMalawinoGreen tickYMandatory individual accountsN/AN/A
MexicoMexicoGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYMandatory individual accountsN/AN/A
MonacoMonacoNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemNoN/A
MongoliaMongoliaGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYNotional Defined ContributionsN/AN/A
MoroccoMoroccoNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
MozambiqueMozambiqueGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
NamibiaNamibiaGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
NepalNepalGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYProvident fund systemN/AN/A
NetherlandsNetherlandsGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemGreen tickYPrivate employee pensionsGreen tickYIndividual private pensions
New ZealandNew ZealandGreen tickYBasic pensionN/AN/AN/A
NigeriaNigeriaNoGreen tickYMandatory individual accountsNoN/A
North KoreaNorth KoreaN/AN/AN/AN/A
NorwayNorwayGreen tickYBasic pensionGreen tickYNotional Defined ContributionsGreen tickYOccupational pension schemesGreen tickYIndividual pensions
OmanOmanNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
PakistanPakistanNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
Papua New GuineaPapua New GuineaNoGreen tickYMandatory occupational retirement systemN/AN/A
PhilippinesPhilippinesGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
PolandPolandBasic pensions for mothers of four or more children from March 2019Green tickYNotional Defined ContributionsGreen tickYVoluntary Open Pension Funds (OFE)Green tickYVoluntary individual accounts:
  • Occupational Pension Programs (PPE)
  • Individual Pension Accounts (IKE/IKZE)
  • Employee Capital Plans (PPK)
PortugalPortugalGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
QatarQatarNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
RomaniaRomaniaNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemGreen tickYMandatory individual accountsGreen tickYVoluntary individual accounts
RussiaRussiaGreen tickYBasic pensionGreen tickYSocial insurance systemGreen tickYMandatory pension fundsGreen tickYVoluntary private pension funds
RwandaRwandaNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
Saudi ArabiaSaudi ArabiaNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
SenegalSenegalNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
Sierra LeoneSierra LeoneNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
SingaporeSingaporeGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYProvident fund systemN/AN/A
SlovakiaSlovakiaGreen tickYBasic pensionGreen tickYSocial insurance systemGreen tickYVoluntary individual accountsN/A
SloveniaSloveniaGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
Solomon IslandsSolomon IslandsNoGreen tickYProvident fund systemN/AN/A
South AfricaSouth AfricaGreen tickYBasic pensionN/AN/AN/A
South KoreaSouth KoreaGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
South SudanSouth SudanNoNoNoN/A
SpainSpainGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
Sri LankaSri LankaNoGreen tickYProvident fund systemGreen tickYSupplementary fundN/A
EswatiniSwazilandGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYProvident fund systemN/AN/A
SwedenSwedenGreen tickYBasic pensionGreen tickYNotional Defined ContributionsGreen tickYMandatory individual accountsN/A
SwitzerlandSwitzerlandN/AGreen tickYSocial insurance systemGreen tickYMandatory occupational pension systemGreen tickYVoluntary pensions funds and endowment policy insurances with tax benefits
SudanSudanNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
TaiwanTaiwanGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemGreen tickYMandatory individual accountsN/A
TanzaniaTanzaniaNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
ThailandThailandGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemGreen tickYVoluntary national savings fundN/A
TurkeyTurkeyGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
TurkmenistanTurkmenistanGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYNotional Defined ContributionsN/AN/A
UgandaUgandaNoGreen tickYProvident fund systemN/AN/A
UkraineUkraineGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemGreen tickYMandatory state pension fundGreen tickYVoluntary individual pensions
United Arab EmiratesUnited Arab EmiratesNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
United KingdomUnited KingdomGreen tickYBasic pensionGreen tickYSocial insurance systemGreen tickYOccupational schemesGreen tickYVoluntary individual pensions:
  • Stakeholder pensions
  • Group personal pensions
  • Self-invested personal pensions
United StatesUnited StatesGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
UruguayUruguayGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemGreen tickYMandatory individual accountsN/A
UzbekistanUzbekistanGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYMandatory individual accountsN/AN/A
VenezuelaVenezuelaGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
VietnamVietnamGreen tickYSocial assistanceGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
ZambiaZambiaNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A
ZimbabweZimbabweNoGreen tickYSocial insurance systemN/AN/A

Notable examples of pension systems by country

Some of the listed systems might also be considered social insurance.

  • Argentina - Administración Nacional de la Seguridad Social

  • Australia: Superannuation in Australia - Private, and compulsory, individual retirement contribution system. Social Security - Public pensions

  • Austria: Pensions in Austria

  • Canada: Canada Pension Plan Old Age Security Quebec Pension Plan Registered Retirement Savings Plan Saskatchewan Pension Plan

  • Hong Kong - Mandatory Provident Fund

  • Finland - Kansaneläkelaitos

  • France: Pensions in France Allocation de Solidarité aux Personnes Agées Pensions Reserve Fund (France)

  • India : National Pension System Employees' Provident Fund Organisation of India

  • Japan - National Pension

  • Malaysia - Employees Provident Fund

  • Mexico - Mexico Pension Plan

  • Netherlands - Algemene Ouderdomswet

  • New Zealand New Zealand Superannuation – public pensions KiwiSaver – Private voluntary retirement contribution system

  • Poland - Social Insurance Institution

  • Singapore - Central Provident Fund

  • South Korea - National Pension Service

  • Sweden - Social security in Sweden

  • Switzerland Pension system in Switzerland

  • United Kingdom: UK pension provision (generally) Self-invested personal pensions

  • United States: Public employee pensions Retirement plans in the United States Social Security

  • Vanuatu - Vanuatu National Provident Fund

See also

  • Elderly care

  • Financial advisor and Fee-only financial advisor

  • Generational accounting

  • Pension led funding

  • Pension model

  • Pensions crisis

  • Public debt

  • Retirement

  • Retirement age

  • Retirement planning

  • Social pension


  • Bankruptcy code

  • Ham and Eggs Movement, California pension proposal of the 1930s-40s

  • Individual Pension Plan (IPP)

  • Pension Rights Center

  • Provident Fund

  • Roth 401(k)

  • Universities Superannuation Scheme


Citation Linkbooks.google.comThomas P. Lemke, Gerald T. Lins (2010). ERISA for Money Managers. Thomson Reuters. ISBN 9780314627056. Retrieved 11 October 2015.
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Linkwordnetweb.princeton.edu"WordNet Search - 3.1". princeton.edu.
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Linkwww.industrysuper.com"Industry SuperFunds - Home". industrysuper.com. Retrieved 17 September 2010.
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Linkwww.pension-watch.net"Country map". pension-watch.net.
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Linkwww.workandincome.govt.nzwebcoordinator@msd.govt.nz. "New Zealand Superannuation". workandincome.govt.nz.
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Link//ssrn.com/abstract=398280Willmore, Larry (April 2003). "Universal Pensions in Mauritius". SSRN 398280. Missing or empty |url= (help)
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Linkwww.services.gov.za"Old age pension". GCIS. Retrieved 7 April 2013.
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Linkwww.oecd.org"Private Pensions/Les pensions privées" (PDF). Retrieved 17 September 2010.
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgLemke and Lins, ERISA for Money Managers, §1:2 (Thomson West, 2013 ed.).
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Linkwww.pensionsadvisoryservice.org.uk"The Pensions Advisory Service". The Pensions Advisory Service. Retrieved 17 September 2010.
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Linkwww.bls.govFoster, Ann C. "Early Retirement Provisions in Defined Benefit Pension Plans" (PDF). bls.gov.
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgShulman*, Gary A. (1999).Qualified Domestic Relations Order Handbook. Aspen Publishers Online. pp. 199–200. ISBN 978-0-7355-0665-7.***
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Linkstats.oecd.org"Unfunded Pension Plans". OECD Glossary of Statistical Terms. Retrieved 26 January 2009.
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Linkwww.economist.com"Falling Short" The Economist April 7, 2011. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Linkfairpensionsforall.netTufts, William; Fairbanks, Lee (2011), Pension Ponzi: How Public-sector Unions are Bankrupting Canada's Health Care, Education and Your Retirement, Mississauga, Ontario: Wiley, p. 210, ISBN 978-1118098738
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Linkwww.nytimes.comWalsh, Mary (14 April 2018). "A $76,000 Monthly Pension: Why States and Cities Are Short on Cash". New York Times. Retrieved 1 May 2018. Oregon — like many other states and cities, including New Jersey, Kentucky and Connecticut — is caught in a fiscal squeeze of its own making. Its economy is growing, but the cost of its state-run pension system is growing faster.
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Link//hdl.handle.net/10036%2F86956Cannon, Edmund; Ian Tonks (2012). "The Value and Risk of Defined Contribution Pension Schemes: International Evidence" (PDF). Journal of Risk and Insurance. 80: 95–119. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6975.2011.01456.x. hdl:10036/86956.
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgLemke and Lins, ERISA for Money Managers §2:26 (Thomson West, 2013 ed.).
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Linkwww.irs.govIRS Announces 2015 Pension Plan Limitations; Taxpayers May Contribute up to $18,000 to their 401(k) plans in 2015
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM
Citation Linkopenlibrary.orgEconomic Policy Committee and the European Commission (2006). The impact of ageing on public expenditure. EU.
Sep 27, 2019, 11:52 AM