Everipedia Logo
Everipedia is now IQ.wiki - Join the IQ Brainlist and our Discord for early access to editing on the new platform and to participate in the beta testing.
Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc.

Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc.

Anderson v. Cryovac was a federal lawsuit concerning toxic contamination of groundwater in Woburn, Massachusetts.

Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc.
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Full case nameAnne Anderson, et al. v. Cryovac, Inc.
ArguedSeptember 3 1986
DecidedNovember 5 1986
Citation(s)Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., 805 F.2d 1 [14] (1st Cir. 1986).

Case

The residents of Woburn, Massachusetts sued Beatrice Foods, the operator of a tannery; Cryovac, a subsidiary of W. R. Grace and Company; and UniFirst, a laundry service, for dumping chemicals that contaminated nearby groundwater. The occurrence of a cancer cluster and other negative effects on health led to revelations of water polluted primarily with trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene.

The first trial included contentious disputes over "splitting" the trial into separate liability and damages phases. W.R. Grace was found liable, and Beatrice was found not liable. Judge Walter Jay Skinner, granted a motion for a mistrial put by W. R. Grace. Woburn residents then appealed that motion, along with Beatrice's not liable verdict. The Court of Appeal ordered a new trial.

The district court then found that a discovery error made by Beatrice impaired the plaintiffs preparation process, and recommended that its earlier denial of motion for relief from judgment be sustained. On appeal, the circuit court judge held that: first, the district court did not abuse its discretion by its determination regarding pretrial discovery, namely, the district court had determined that the operator's failure to disclose a report during pretrial discovery did not warrant relief from judgment. Second, the judge held that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it determined that the operator's nondisclosure of a report was roughly equivalent to residents' improper continuation of prosecution of their claim, and thus that monetary sanctions should not be imposed upon either party. Finally, the judge found that the operator's nondisclosure of report did not constitute “fraud on the court” which would trigger entry of default.

On 22 September 1986, W.R. Grace settled with the plaintiffs for an undisclosed amount of money, however many sources report that it was around $8 million.[1]

Follow-up

On January 28, 1987, W.R. Grace was indicted by a grand jury of lying to the EPA about its usage and disposal of toxic waste.[2] Anderson Regional Transportation Center was later built on the site and named in memory of James R. "Jimmy" Anderson (1968–1981), whose mother Anne was the main plaintiff.

Media

The book A Civil Action, published in 1996, documents the case and related events. The 1998 film of the same name, starring John Travolta as Jan Schlichtmann, was drawn from the book and loosely based on the case and related events.

See also

  • A Civil Action: A Documentary Companion, By Lewis A Grossman, Robert G Vaughn (West 2008) (ISBN 9781599415581)

  • Anderson v. Cryovac, C.A. No. 82-1672-S (D. Mass); (Anne Anderson et al. v. Cryovac Inc. W.R. Grace Inc., John J. Riley Company Inc., Beatrice Inc. et al. Superior Court Civil Action #82-2444, Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Filed May 14, 1982.)

  • Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., 96 F.R.D. 431 (D. Mass. 1983)

  • Anderson v. W.R. Grace & Co., 628 F. Supp. 1219 [15] (D. Mass. 1986)

  • Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., 805 F.2d 1 [16] (1st Cir. Mass. 1986)

  • Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., 862 F.2d 910 [17] (1st Cir. Mass. 1988), on remand, Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co., 127 F.R.D. 1 (D. Mass. 1989)

  • Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co., 129 F.R.D. 394 (D. Mass. 1989), aff'd, 900 F.2d 388 [18] (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 891 (1990)

References

[1]
Citation Linkarticles.latimes.comDrogin, Bob (23 September 1986). "Settlement Ends Pollution Trial : W. R. Grace Will Pay $8 Million to Families". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2015-01-16.
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[2]
Citation Linkwww.nytimes.com"W.R. Grace is charged with lying about waste". The New York Times. 29 January 1987. Retrieved 2015-01-16.
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[3]
Citation Linkscholar.google.com628 F. Supp. 1219
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[4]
Citation Linkopenjurist.org805 F.2d 1
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[5]
Citation Linkopenjurist.org862 F.2d 910
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[6]
Citation Linkopenjurist.org900 F.2d 388
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[7]
Citation Linkserc.carleton.edu"Science in the Courtroom - The Woburn Toxic Trial"
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[8]
Citation Linkserc.carleton.edu"Case Summary"
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[9]
Citation Linkserc.carleton.edu"The Woburn Toxic Trial Process"
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[10]
Citation Linkweb.archive.org"Anderson v. Beatrice Foods - Index of Pleadings"
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[11]
Citation Linkwww.law.fsu.eduthe original
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[12]
Citation Linkhome.comcast.net"Toxic Legacy: The Lessons of Woburn, Mass"
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[13]
Citation Linkyosemite.epa.gov"Waste Site Cleanup & Reuse in New England - Wells G & H"
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[14]
Citation Linkopenjurist.org805 F.2d 1
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[15]
Citation Linkscholar.google.com628 F. Supp. 1219
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[16]
Citation Linkopenjurist.org805 F.2d 1
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[17]
Citation Linkopenjurist.org862 F.2d 910
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[18]
Citation Linkopenjurist.org900 F.2d 388
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[19]
Citation Linkarticles.latimes.com"Settlement Ends Pollution Trial : W. R. Grace Will Pay $8 Million to Families"
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM
[20]
Citation Linkwww.nytimes.com"W.R. Grace is charged with lying about waste"
Sep 30, 2019, 5:15 AM