On 19 March 2011, a multi-state NATO -led coalition began a military intervention in Libya , ostensibly to implement United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 . The was to have "an immediate ceasefire in Libya, including an end to the current attacks against civilians, which it said might constitute crimes against humanity ... imposing a ban on all flights in the country's airspace – a no-fly zone – and tightened sanctions on the Qadhafi regime and its supporters." The resolution was taken in response to events during the Libyan Civil War , and military operations began, with American and British naval forces firing over 110 Tomahawk cruise missiles , [33] the French Air Force , British Royal Air Force , and Royal Canadian Air Force [5] undertaking sorties across Libya and a naval blockade by Coalition forces. [37] French jets launched air strikes against Libyan Army tanks and vehicles. [5] [5] The Libyan government response to the campaign was totally ineffectual, with Gaddafi's forces not managing to shoot down a single NATO plane despite the country possessing 30 heavy SAM batteries, 17 medium SAM batteries, 55 light SAM batteries (a total of 400–450 launchers, including 130–150 2K12 Kub launchers and some 9K33 Osa launchers), and 440–600 short-ranged air-defense guns. [5] [5] The official names for the interventions by the coalition members are Opération Harmattan by France; Operation Ellamy by the United Kingdom; Operation Mobile for the Canadian participation and Operation Odyssey Dawn for the United States. [42]

From the beginning of the intervention, the initial coalition of Belgium , Canada, Denmark , France, Italy, Norway , Qatar , Spain, UK and US [5] [5] [7] [7] [7] expanded to nineteen states, with newer states mostly enforcing the no-fly zone and naval blockade or providing military logistical assistance. The effort was initially largely led by France and the United Kingdom, with command shared with the United States. NATO took control of the arms embargo on 23 March, named Operation Unified Protector . An attempt to unify the military command of the air campaign (whilst keeping political and strategic control with a small group), first failed over objections by the French, German, and Turkish governments. [7] [7] On 24 March, NATO agreed to take control of the no-fly zone, while command of targeting ground units remains with coalition forces. [7] [7] [7] The handover occurred on 31 March 2011 at 06:00 UTC (08:00 local time). NATO flew 26,500 sorties since it took charge of the Libya mission on 31 March 2011.

Fighting in Libya ended in late October following the death of Muammar Gaddafi , and NATO stated it would end operations over Libya on 31 October 2011. Libya's new government requested that its mission be extended to the end of the year, [7] but on 27 October, the Security Council voted to end NATO's mandate for military action on 31 October. [7]

Proposal for the no-fly zone

Both Libyan officials [59] [61] [363] [364] and international states [365] [366] [367] [71] and organizations [368] [370] [80] [82] [83] called for a no-fly zone over Libya in light of allegations that Muammar Gaddafi 's military had conducted airstrikes against Libyan rebels in the Libyan Civil War .

Chronology

File:US Supports No-Fly Zone Against Libya.ogv
VOA News report on the United States joining Lebanon, France and United Kingdom to support the no-fly zone.
  • 15 March 2011: A resolution for a no-fly zone was proposed by Nawaf Salam , Lebanon's Ambassador to the UN. The resolution was immediately backed by France and the United Kingdom. [10]
  • 17 March 2011: The UN Security Council, acting under the authority of Chapter VII of the UN Charter , approved a no-fly zone by a vote of ten in favour, zero against, and five abstentions, via United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 . The five abstentions were: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and Germany. [80] [82] [83] [10] Less than twenty-four hours later, Libya announced that it would halt all military operations in response to the UN Security Council resolution. [10] [10]
  • 18 March 2011: The Libyan foreign minister, Moussa Koussa , said that he had declared a ceasefire, attributing the UN resolution. [10] However, artillery shelling on Misrata and Ajdabiya continued, and government soldiers continued approaching Benghazi . [33] [10] Government troops and tanks entered the city on 19 March. [104] Artillery and mortars were also fired into the city. [105] US President Barack Obama held a meeting with eighteen senior lawmakers at the White House on the afternoon of 18 March [107]
  • 19 March 2011: French [6] forces began the military intervention in Libya, later joined by coalition forces with strikes against armoured units south of Benghazi and attacks on Libyan air-defence systems, as UN Security Council Resolution 1973 called for using "all necessary means" to protect civilians and civilian-populated areas from attack, imposed a no-fly zone, and called for an immediate and with-standing cease-fire, while also strengthening travel bans on members of the regime, arms embargoes, and asset freezes.
  • 21 March 2011: Obama sent a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate. [110]
  • 24 March 2011: In telephone negotiations, French foreign minister Alain Juppé agreed to let NATO take over all military operations on 29 March at the latest, allowing Turkey to veto strikes on Gaddafi ground forces from that point forward. [360] Later reports stated that NATO would take over enforcement of the no-fly zone and the arms embargo, but discussions were still under way about whether NATO would take over the protection of civilians mission. Turkey reportedly wanted the power to veto airstrikes, while France wanted to prevent Turkey from having such a veto. [74] [112]
File:Weekly Address-The Military Mission in Libya.ogv
US President Barack Obama addressing the people of the United States about the US intervention in Libya
  • 25 March 2011: NATO Allied Joint Force Command in Naples took command of the no-fly zone over Libya and combined it with the ongoing arms embargo operation under the name Operation Unified Protector . [113]
  • 28 March 2011: Obama addressed the American people on Libya. [114]

Enforcement

Initial NATO planning for a possible no-fly zone took place in late February and early March, [116] especially by NATO members France and the United Kingdom. [118] France and the UK were early supporters of a no-fly zone and had sufficient airpower to impose a no-fly zone over the rebel-held areas, although they might need additional assistance for a more extensive exclusion zone.

The US had the air assets necessary to enforce a no-fly zone, but was cautious about supporting such an action prior to obtaining a legal basis for violating Libya's sovereignty. Furthermore, due to the sensitive nature of military action by the US against an Arab nation, the US sought Arab participation in the enforcement of a no-fly zone.

At a congressional hearing , United States Secretary of Defense Robert Gates explained that "a no-fly zone begins with an attack on Libya to destroy the air defences ... and then you can fly planes around the country and not worry about our guys being shot down. But that's the way it starts." [119]

On 19 March, the deployment of French fighter jets over Libya began, [37] and other states began their individual operations. Phase One started the same day with the involvement of the United States, United Kingdom, France, Italy and Canada. [8]

On 24 March, NATO ambassadors agreed that NATO would take command of the no-fly zone enforcement, while other military operations remained the responsibility of the group of states previously involved, with NATO expected to take control as early as 26 March. [378] The decision was made after meetings of NATO members to resolve disagreements over whether military operations in Libya should include attacks on ground forces. [378] The decision will create a two-level power structure overseeing military operations. In charge politically will be a committee, led by NATO, that includes all states participating in enforcing the no-fly zone, while NATO alone will be responsible for military action. [379] Royal Canadian Air Force Lieutenant-General Charles Bouchard has been appointed to command the NATO military mission. [124]

After the death of Muammar Gaddafi on 20 October 2011, it was announced that the NATO mission would end on 31 October. [125]

Operation names

    Image
    Coloured in blue are the states that were involved in implementing the no-fly zone over Libya (coloured in green)

Before NATO took full command of operations at 06:00 GMT on 31 March 2011, the military intervention in the form of a no-fly zone and naval blockade was split between different national operations:

Forces committed

These are the forces committed in alphabetical order.

Image
  • Denmark: The Royal Danish Air Force participated with six F-16AM fighters, one C-130J-30 Super Hercules military transport plane and the corresponding ground crews. Only four F-16s were used for offensive operations, while the remaining two acted as reserves. [138] The first airstrikes from Danish aircraft were carried out on 23 March, with four aircraft making twelve sorties as part of Operation Odyssey Dawn. [38] Danish F-16s flew a total of 43 missions dropping 107 precision bombs during Odyssey Dawn before switching to NATO command under Unified Protector [142] Danish flights bombed approximately 17 percent of all targets in Libya and together with Norwegian flights have been the most efficient in proportion to the number of flights involved. [143] Danish F-16s flew the last fast-jet mission of Operation Unified Protector on 31 October 2011 [3] finishing with a total of 599 missions flown and 923 precision bombs dropped during the entire Libya intervention. [3]
  • France: French Air Force , which flew the highest percentage of NATO's strikes (35%), participated in the mission with 18 Mirage , 19 Rafale , 6 Mirage F1 , 6 Super Etendard , 2 E-2 Hawkeye , 2 C-2 Greyhound , 3 Eurocopter Tiger , 16 Aérospatiale Gazelle aircraft. In addition, the French Navy anti-air destroyer Forbin and the frigate Jean Bart participated in the operations. [148] On 22 March, the aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle arrived in international waters near Crete to provide military planners with a rapid-response air combat capability. [149] Accompanying the Charles de Gaulle were the frigates Dupleix , Aconit , the fleet replenishment tanker Meuse, and one Rubis-class nuclear attack submarine. [3] France did station three Mirage 2000-5 aircraft and 6 Mirage 2000D at Souda Bay , Crete . [151] France also sent an amphibious assault helicopter carrier, the Tonnerre , carrying 19 rotorcraft to operate off the coast of Libya. [3]
Image
Palmarias of the Libyan Army, destroyed by French air force near Benghazi , 19 March
Image
Damage to aircraft shelters at Ghardabiya Airfield near Sirte, 20 March

Bases committed

Actions by other states

  • Albania : Albanian Prime Minister Sali Berisha said that Albania is ready to help. Prime Minister Berisha supported the decision of the coalition to protect civilians from the Libyan regime of Gaddafi. Berisha also offered assistance to facilitate the international coalition actions. In a press release of the Prime Ministry, these operations are considered entirely legitimate, having as main objective the protection of freedoms and universal rights that Libyans deserve. [3] On 29 March, Foreign Minister Edmond Haxhinasto said Albania would open its airspace and territorial waters to coalition forces and said its seaports and airports were at the coalition's disposal upon request. Haxhinasto also suggested that Albania could make a "humanitarian" contribution to international efforts. [3] In mid-April, the International Business Times listed Albania alongside several other NATO member states, including Romania and Turkey, that have made "modest" contributions to the military effort, although it did not go into detail. [3]
  • Australia : Prime Minister Julia Gillard and others in her Labor government have said Australia will not contribute militarily to enforcement of the UN mandate despite registering strong support for its implementation, but the opposition Liberal Party's defence spokesman has called upon the government to consider dispatching Australian military assets if requested by NATO . [3] Defence Minister Stephen Smith said the government would be willing to send C-17 Globemaster heavy transport planes for use in international operations "as part of a humanitarian contribution", if needed. [3] Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd described Australia as the "third largest [humanitarian contributor to Libya] globally after the United States and the European Union" on 27 April, after a humanitarian aid ship funded by the Australian government docked in Misurata. [3]
  • Croatia : President Ivo Josipović said that if it becomes necessary Croatia will honour its NATO membership and participate in the actions in Libya. He also stressed that while Croatia is ready for military participation according to its capabilities, it will mostly endeavor to help on the humanitarian side. [3] On 29 April, the government announced it planned to send two Croatian Army officers to assist with Operation Unified Protector pending formal presidential and parliamentary approval. [3]
  • Cyprus : After the passage of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 , President Demetris Christofias asked the British government not to use its military base at Akrotiri , an overseas territory of the United Kingdom on the island of Cyprus, in support of the intervention, though this request had no legal weight as Nicosia cannot legally bar the United Kingdom from using the base. [3] The Cypriot government reluctantly allowed Qatar Emiri Air Force fighter jets and a transport plane to refuel at Larnaca International Airport on 22 March after their pilots declared a fuel emergency while in transit to Crete for participation in international military operations. [3]
  • Estonia : Foreign Minister Urmas Paet said on 18 March that his country has no current plans to join in military operations in Libya, but it would be willing to participate if called upon to do so by NATO or the European Union . [3] The Estonian Air Force does not presently operate any fighter aircraft, though it does operate a few helicopters and transport planes.
  • European Union : Finnish foreign minister Alexander Stubb announced that the proposed operation is being prepared, waiting for a request from the UN. [3]
  • Germany : Germany has withdrawn all forces from NATO operations in the Mediterranean Sea as its government decided not to take part in any military operations against Libya. However it is increasing the number of AWACS personnel in Afghanistan by up to 300 to free forces of other states. Germany allows the usage of military installations on its territory for the intervention in Libya. [3] [3] [3] [3] On 8 April, German officials suggested that Germany could potentially contribute troops to "[ensure] with military means that humanitarian aid gets to those who need it". [3] As of early June, the German government is reportedly considering opening a center for training police in Benghazi. [3] On 24 July, Germany lent €100 million Euros ($144 million USD ) to the rebels for "civilian and humanitarian purposes".
  • Image
  • Kuwait : The Arab state will make a "logistic contribution", according to the British Prime Minister David Cameron. [240] [242]
  • Malta : Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi said no coalition forces would be allowed to stage from military bases in Malta, but Maltese airspace would be open to international forces involved in the intervention. [3] On 20 April, two French Mirages were reportedly allowed to make emergency landings in Malta after running low on fuel. [3]
  • Poland : US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates , UK Secretary of Defence Liam Fox , and NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen have urged the Polish government to contribute to military operations. As of June 2011, Warsaw has not committed to participation. [3]
  • Sudan : The government has "quietly granted permission" for coalition states to traverse its airspace for operations in the Libyan theater if necessary, Reuters reported in late March. [3]

Action by international forces

Civilian losses

14 May : NATO air strike hit a large number of people gathered for Friday prayers in the eastern city of Brega leaving 11 religious leaders dead and 50 others wounded. [3]
24 May : NATO air strikes in Tripoli kill 19 civilians and wound 150, according to Libyan state television. [3]
31 May : Libya claims that NATO strikes have left up to 718 civilians dead. [3]
19 June : NATO air strikes hit a residential house in Tripoli, killing seven civilians, according to Libyan state television. [3]
20 June : A NATO airstrike in Sorman , near Tripoli, killed fifteen civilians, according to government officials. [406] Eight rockets apparently hit the compound of a senior government official, in an area where NATO confirmed operations had taken place. [406]
25 June : NATO strikes on Brega hit a bakery and a restaurant, killing 15 civilians and wounding 20 more, Libyan state television claimed. The report further accused the coalition of "crimes against humanity". The claims were denied by NATO. [3]
28 June : NATO airstrike on the town of Tawergha , 300 km east of the Libyan capital, Tripoli kills eight civilians. [3]
25 July : NATO airstrike on a medical clinic in Zliten kills 11 civilians, though the claim was denied by NATO, who said they hit a vehicle depot and communications center. [3] [3]
20 July : NATO attacks Libyan state TV, Al-Jamahiriya . Three journalists killed. [3]
9 August : Libyan government claims 85 civilians were killed in a NATO airstrike in Majer, a village near Zliten. A spokesman confirms that NATO bombed Zliten at 2:34 a.m. on 9 August, [3] but says he was unable to confirm the casualties. Commander of the NATO military mission, Lieutenant General Charles Bouchard says "I cannot believe that 85 civilians were present when we struck in the wee hours of the morning, and given our intelligence. But I cannot assure you that there were none at all". [3]
15 September : Gaddafi spokesman Moussa Ibrahim declares that NATO air strikes killed 354 civilians and wounded 700 others, while 89 other civilians are supposedly missing. He also claims that over 2,000 civilians have been killed by NATO air strikes since 1 September. [3] NATO denied the claims, saying they were unfounded. [3]
2 March 2012 : United Nations Human Rights Council release their report about the aftermath of the Libyan civil war, concluding that in total 60 civilians were killed and 55 wounded by the NATO air campaign. [3] In May that same year, Human Rights Watch published a report claiming that at least 72 civilians were killed. [355]

Military losses on the coalition side

  • 22 March : One USAF F-15E flying from Aviano crashed in Bu Marim, northwest of Benghazi. The pilot was rescued alive by US Marines from the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit based on the USS Kearsarge . The weapons systems officer evaded hostile forces and was subsequently repatriated by undisclosed forces. [5] [5] The aircraft crashed due to a mechanical failure. [5] The rescue operation involved two Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey aircraft, two Sikorsky CH-53 Sea Stallion helicopters, and two McDonnell Douglas AV-8B Harrier II aircraft, all launched from the USS Kearsarge . [411] The operation involved the Harriers' dropping 227 kg (500 lb) bombs and strafing the area around the crash site before an Osprey recovered at least one of the downed aircraft's crew; [411] [5] injuring six local civilians in the process. [5] [5]
  • 27 April : An F-16 from the United Arab Emirates Air Force crashed at Naval Air Station Sigonella at about 11:35 local time; the pilot ejected safely. The aircraft was confirmed to be from the UAE by the country's General Command of the armed forces, and had been arriving from Sardinia when it crashed.
  • 21 June : An unmanned US Navy MQ-8 Fire Scout went down over Libya, possibly due to enemy fire. [353] NATO confirmed that they lost radar contact with the unmanned helicopter as it was performing an intelligence and reconnaissance mission near Zliten. [353] NATO began investigating the crash shortly after it occurred. [353] On 5 August, it was announced that the investigation had concluded that the cause of the crash was probably enemy fire; with operator or mechanical failure ruled out and the inability of investigators to access the crash site the "logical conclusion" was that the aircraft had been shot down. [5]
  • 20 July : A British airman was killed in a traffic accident in Italy while part of a logistical convoy transferring supplies from the UK to NATO bases in the south of Italy from which air strikes were being conducted against Libya. [12] [14]

Reaction

Since the start of the campaign, there have been allegations of violating the limits imposed upon the intervention by Resolution 1973 and by US law. At the end of May 2011, Western troops were captured on film in Libya, despite Resolution 1973 specifically forbidding "a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory". [283] In the article however, it reports that armed Westerners but not Western troops were on the ground. [283]

On 10 June, US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates criticized some of the NATO member nations for their efforts, or lack thereof, to participate in the intervention in Libya. Gates singled out Germany, Poland, Spain, Turkey, and the Netherlands for criticism. He praised Canada, Norway and Denmark, saying that although those three countries had only provided twelve percent of the aircraft to the operation, their aircraft had conducted one-third of the strikes. [5]

On June 24, the US House voted against Joint Resolution 68, which would have authorized continued US military involvement in the NATO campaign for up to one year. [5] [5] The majority of Republicans voted against the resolution, [5] with some questioning US interests in Libya and others criticizing the White House for overstepping its authority by conducting a military expedition without Congressional backing. House Democrats were split on the issue, with 115 voting in favor of and 70 voting against. Despite the failure of the President to receive legal authorization from Congress, the Obama administration continued its military campaign, carrying out the bulk of NATO's operations until the overthrow of Gadaffi in October.

On 9 August, the head of UNESCO , Irina Bokova deplored a NATO strike on Libyan State TV, Al-Jamahiriya , that killed 3 journalists and wounded others. Bokova declared that media outlets should not be the target of military activities. On 11 August, after the NATO airstrike on Majer (on 9 August) that allegedly killed 85 civilians, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called on all sides to do as much as possible to avoid killing innocent people. [288]

Responsibility to protect

The military intervention in Libya has been cited by the Council on Foreign Relations as an example of the responsibility to protect policy adopted by the UN at the 2005 World Summit . [290] According to Gareth Evans , "[t]he international military intervention (SMH) in Libya is not about bombing for democracy or Muammar Gaddafi's head. Legally, morally, politically, and militarily it has only one justification: protecting the country's people." [290] However, the Council also noted that the policy had been used only in Libya, and not in countries such as Côte d'Ivoire , undergoing a political crisis at the time, or in response to protests in Yemen . [290] A CFR expert, Stewert Patrick, said that "There is bound to be selectivity and inconsistency in the application of the responsibility to protect norm given the complexity of national interests at stake in...the calculations of other major powers involved in these situations." [290] In January 2012, the Arab Organization for Human Rights , Palestinian Centre for Human Rights and the International Legal Assistance Consortium published a report describing alleged human rights violations and accusing NATO of war crimes. [5]

Criticism

Some critics of Western military intervention suggested that resources—not democratic or humanitarian concerns—were the real impetus for the intervention, among them a journalist of London Arab nationalist newspaper Al-Quds Al-Arabi, the Russian TV network RT and the (then-)leaders of Venezuela and Zimbabwe, Hugo Chávez and Robert Mugabe. [292] [293] [294] [295] Gaddafi's Libya , despite its relatively small population, was known to possess vast resources, particularly in the form of oil reserves and financial capital . [5] Libya is a member of OPEC and one of the world's largest oil producers . It was producing roughly 1.6 million barrels a day before the war, nearly 70 percent of them through the state-owned National Oil Corporation . [5] Additionally, the country's sovereign wealth fund , the Libyan Investment Authority , was one of the largest in the world, controlling assets worth approximately US$ 56 billion, including over 100 tons of gold reserves in the Central Bank of Libya . [5]

Accusations of imperialism on the part of NATO and the West were voiced by many leaders of states that had traditionally aligned themselves with the Communist bloc and subsequently Russia, including: Iran 's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei (who said he supported the rebels but not Western intervention [295] ), Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez (who referred to Gaddafi as a " martyr " [294] ), and President of Zimbabwe Robert Mugabe (who referred to the Western nations as "vampires" [293] ), as well as the governments of Raúl Castro in Cuba, [5] Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua, [5] Kim Jong-il in North Korea, [5] Hifikepunye Pohamba in Namibia, [5] and others. Gaddafi himself referred to the intervention as a "colonial crusade ... capable of unleashing a full scale war", [5] a sentiment that was echoed by Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin : "[ UNSC Resolution 1973 ] is defective and flawed...It allows everything. It resembles medieval calls for crusades." [5] President Hu Jintao of the People's Republic of China said, "Dialogue and other peaceful means are the ultimate solutions to problems," and added, "If military action brings disaster to civilians and causes a humanitarian crisis, then it runs counter to the purpose of the UN resolution." [5] Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was critical of the intervention as well, rebuking the coalition in a speech at the UN in September 2011. [5] Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi , despite the substantial role his country played in the NATO mission, also spoke out against getting involved: "I had my hands tied by the vote of the parliament of my country. But I was against and I am against this intervention which will end in a way that no-one knows" and added "This wasn't a popular uprising because Gaddafi was loved by his people, as I was able to see when I went to Libya." [5] [5]

Russia's foreign broadcasting service , RT , has postulated that NATO intervention may have been motivated by Gaddafi's attempts to establish a unified federation of African states that would use the gold dinar as its currency and demand that foreign importers of African oil pay in gold. [292] Despite its stated opposition to NATO intervention, Russia abstained from voting on Resolution 1973 instead of exercising its veto power as a permanent member of the Security Council ; four other powerful nations also abstained from the vote— India , China, Germany, and Brazil —but of that group only China has the same veto power. [5]

Moreover, criticisms have been made on the way the operation was led. According to Michael Kometer and Stephen Wright, the outcome of the Libyan intervention was reached by default rather than by design. It appears that there was an important lack of consistent political guidance caused particularly by the vagueness of the UN mandate and the ambiguous consensus among the NATO-led coalition. This lack of clear political guidance was translated into an incoherent military planning on the operational level. Such a gap may impact the future NATO's operations that will probably face trust issues. [5]

In 2015 through 2016 the British parliament's Foreign Affairs Select Committee conducted an extensive and highly critical inquiry into the British involvement in the civil war. It concluded that the early threat to civilians had been overstated and that the significant Islamist element in the rebel forces had not been recognised, due to an intelligence failure. By summer 2011 the initial limited intervention to protect Libyan civilians had become a policy of regime change . However that new policy did not include proper support and for a new government, leading to a political and economic collapse in Libya and the growth of ISIL in North Africa. The Foreign Affairs Select Committee saw no evidence that the UK Government carried out a proper analysis of the nature of the rebellion in Libya and it "selectively took elements of Muammar Gaddafi’s rhetoric at face value; and it failed to identify the militant Islamist extremist element in the rebellion. UK strategy was founded on erroneous assumptions and an incomplete understanding of the evidence". The former Prime Minister David Cameron was ultimately responsible for this British policy failure. [507] [508] [88]

Blowback

The "blowback from interventionist policies carried out in the name of human rights and civilian protection ", [5] was a massive consequence contributing to the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing . The perpetrator, Salman Ramadan Abedi , was a 22-year-old British Sunni Muslim of Libyan ancestry. [422] [5] He was born in Manchester on 31 December 1994 to a Salafi [5] family of Libyan-born refugees who had settled in south Manchester after fleeing to the UK to escape the government of Muammar Gaddafi . He had two brothers and a sister. [29] [5] He grew up in the Whalley Range area and lived in Fallowfield . [3]

Costs

Funds spent by Foreign Powers on War in Libya.
Country Funds Spent By
United Kingdom US$336–1,500 million September 2011 (estimate) [5] [5]
Image
A Qatari C-17 transport plane at Incirlik Air Base , Turkey.
Italy€700 million EUROctober 2011 [5] France€450 million EURSeptember 2011 [5] [5] TurkeyUS$300 millionJuly 2011 [5] Denmark€120 million EURNovember 2011 [5] Belgium€58 million EUROctober 2011 [5] Spain€50 million EURSeptember 2011 [5] SwedenUS$50 millionOctober 2011 [5] CanadaUS$26 millionJune 2011 [5]

On 22 March 2011, BBC News presented a breakdown of the likely costs to the UK of the mission. [5] Journalist Francis Tusa, editor of Defence Analysis, estimated that flying a Tornado GR4 would cost about £ 35,000 an hour (c. US$48,000), so the cost of patrolling one sector of Libyan airspace would be £2M–3M (US$2.75M–4.13M) per day. Conventional airborne missiles would cost £800,000 each and Tomahawk cruise missiles £750,000 each. Professor Malcolm Charmers of the Royal United Services Institute similarly suggested that a single cruise missile would cost about £500,000, while a single Tornado sortie would cost about £30,000 in fuel alone. If a Tornado was downed the replacement cost would be upwards of £50m. By 22 March the US and UK had already fired more than 110 cruise missiles. UK Chancellor George Osborne had said that the MoD estimate of the operation cost was "tens rather than hundreds of millions". On 4 April Air Chief Marshal Sir Stephen Dalton said that the RAF was planning to continue operations over Libya for at least six months. [5]

The total number of sorties flown by NATO numbered more than 26,000, an average of 120 sorties per day. 42% of the sorties were strike sorties, which damaged or destroyed approximately 6,000 military targets. At its peak, the operation involved more than 8,000 servicemen and women, 21 NATO ships in the Mediterranean and more than 250 aircraft of all types. By the end of the operation, NATO had conducted over 3,000 hailings at sea and almost 300 boardings for inspection, with 11 vessels denied transit to their next port of call. [5]

See also